Do Parents Need to Get Vaccinations Before Baby Arrives

Update Jan seven, 2022: The numbers in the Denmark written report described beneath are now confirmed by government data from Frg showing that vaccinated people are 8X more likely to develop Omicron than unvaccinated people. This is not surprising since a paper from Germany showed the same thing: the more you lot vaccinate, the worse it gets.

Worried about Omicron? Gauge what? Later 90 days, the vaccine they gave you is going to brand y'all MORE likely to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to become off in the future and the easier you'll brand information technology for the virus.

In short, we've been lied to about the vaccine. It is protecting yous less and less over time. While you may get a benefit for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In brusk, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, just at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else.

These vaccines may aid y'all win the state of war against a variant that may soon exist rare, but the price you pay is that you make your immunity to everything else worse. It's a dumb tradeoff (peculiarly since early treatments work and then well). Only the people making the laws won't believe any of the scientific discipline referenced in this commodity, so it will continue.

Alix Mayer alerted me to this game changing tweet about a study in Denmark which instantly went viral as you can run across from the number of retweets:

I want to tell you what this really ways and how it is being attacked.

Summary: Turn down to comply with mandates. At present.

This paper means we will need to inject people every 30 days if we want to "protect" them. Based on the harm that the vaccines do to our immune system, it'southward likely that the needed interval will shorten with each booster.

If people don't go boosted as required, they volition be More than vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren't vaccinated. That's what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. Information technology doesn't mean the protection wears off (similar we were told). Information technology means the OPPOSITE of what you were told: it means the vaccines helps the virus to infect yous (past suppressing your immune system, probably permanently each time we are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole). Information technology means we were lied to.

In brusk, the vaccine is like a heroin addiction: in one case you've had a gustation of information technology, y'all are hooked: you have to continue it for life if y'all want protection. If you lot finish it, y'all're a sitting duck for the virus.

What'due south worse is our government is mandating this now. In low-cal of this paper, they volition change the vaccine mandates to force you to become vaccinated every calendar month or you will be fired from your task. Their next motility could well be to arrive illegal not to be vaccinated. This seems like where things are headed based on what is happening in other countries where they are quickly stripping away your rights to do anything without a vaccination.

And we accept no clue what monthly (and later weekly) vaccination volition exercise to your torso. This has never been tested.

My communication is simple. If you take been vaccinated, you need to stop at present. Do not get the booster. My friend Dr. Robert Malone is fond of repeating the old adage, "When you discover yourself in a hole, stop earthworks ."

Sadly, about people cannot afford to lose their jobs, so they will go vaccinated and medical professionals volition not speak out since doing so will cause them to lose their license.

The faster, safer, lower cost manner to end the pandemic

Everyone needs to cease listening to the CDC now and start listening to people who have been proverb to ditch the vaccines and aggressively promote early on treatment with repurposed drugs.

The unabridged pandemic will end every bit presently as the CDC stops ignoring the existing early on treatment protocols which have been available since March 2020 (Fareed and Tyson protocol was start available back then). Masking, vaccines, mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing were never needed. Nosotros could have (and notwithstanding tin can) end the hospitalization and death with but one matter: early treatment. Just similar Japan has done. But the CDC refused to heed.

What the paper said in detail

Showtime, the link in the tweet is to the outdated version of the paper. The current version can be found here.

Outset at the comments, both from social media and also from medrxiv readers.

Check out the social media portion of the comments

Here are some comments (on old and new version of the paper):

• And then assume the results you like (high VE for recent vaccination) are causal, just hand wave confounders at results you don't like (negative VE for afar vaccination)? Science?

• This is a superb paper, especially the careful approach to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.

• Looking at the graphs, I run across both vaccines lose all effectiveness at 90 days, but worse, actually drop into strong negative effectiveness later on that time.

  This would mean that these vaccines *increase* 1's chances of infection after the initial 90 days "honeymoon" period.

  Am I getting this right?

  If so, why are governments pushing tertiary doses every bit Omicron is becoming dominant?

The fundamental material is in the full PDF:

The graphs above tell the story. Negative VE means the vaccine is helping the virus, not you.

So at 60 days, the protection is shut to naught, so if yous want to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every 30 days is required.

This isn't a vaccine at all. This is basically stimulating your immune arrangement so information technology is already "geared upward" to fight the virus. That's non what a vaccine is supposed to exercise.

Furthermore, the negative VE afterwards xc days ways you are hooked for life and I would guess (based on the mechanism of activity), that we will need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster you lot get (since it kills off your allowed organization every time).

So it could very well exist monthly boosters after the second dose, weekly boosters later the 3rd dose, and perhaps daily boosters after the fourth dose to maintain your "immunity."

You can't stop subsequently that because if you finish, you're in worse shape than if you never started.

The stunning conclusion of the paper

In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.

All I can say is "wow." The people who wrote this paper are clearly drinking the Kool-Aid on their estimation of what their study means.

They too wrote this (which is purely speculative with no data behind it as noted in the italics were my addition):

The negative estimates in the final period arguably suggest different behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This was likely the result of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through single (super-spreading) events causing many infections amid young, vaccinated individuals.

This paper should be a wake up call: the vaccines do not work. Stop repeating the insanity.

Early treatments like the Fareed and Tyson protocol are 10X meliorate than any new therapy, they don't "hook you," and they don't crusade inability or death.

If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson protocol, we'd take virtually no deaths, and few hospitalizations. But they tin't do that since medical lath will take away the licenses of any physicians who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening now.

We are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are decadent and incompetent and they will non hold themselves answerable in an open up contend. This has been going on for xx years in the vaccine space… information technology's cypher new. The volume "Evidence of harm" documents all of this. Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (being non-judgmental like reporters are supposed to be), but any neutral thinking person volition side against the regime.

Why the paper went viral

So, the reason this paper went viral is because

1. It is well washed,

2. It was washed by PhDs in infectious disease and epidemiology,

3. The results show what is actually happening, and

4. Nobody has been able to attack the paper with a credible argument, even on Twitter.

5. It confirms what my team of experts has been saying most negative VE

Here are some of the ridiculous attempts to discredit the paper:

Supporting evidence

The paper isn't a fluke. There is lots of other evidence in support of the negative VE (and not supporting their speculative caption for information technology).

Here's the data from Canada which shows that we accept information technology backwards. Nosotros should be mandating "no vaccines" in order to keep your job and fire all the vaccinated people because these people are the most risky.

In Ontario in the last few days, cases per capita among the vaccinated have skyrocketed above cases per capita among the unvaccinated. Clearly, mandates are nonsensical at this point, because the entire instance for restricting unvaccinated people is their presumed higher per capita infection rate.

Here's the Uk data showing the aforementioned matter. We need to flip around the mandates ASAP.

Other supporting data:

1. On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable bear witness of their causative role in deaths later vaccination and the video near that paper. If the vaccines don't kill y'all, they volition leave you weaker. Over 90% of the deaths investigated after vaccination were constitute to have been caused by the vaccines. There is no other caption.

2. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
   An excellent article by Jessica Rose which explains the underlying mechanism for why we are seeing the result that the more you vaccinate, the more you make things worse for people. The vaccine damages both your adaptive and innate immune systems.

3. Vaccine efficacy declines to exist negative in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland (Betrayal article)

4. Booster protection fades inside x weeks against Omicron: U.k. written report

5. Booster shots protect against symptomatic Omicron infection for about 10 weeks, written report finds — which could mean more doses for some in 2022

6. This substack article looks at the Danish study (described hither) and the United kingdom data. Note that the VE numbers in the two studies are unlike considering if you separate our Omicron, yous get a very dissimilar picture of VE compared to analyses that don't separate out VE past variant.

7. Dr. Ron Chocolate-brown – Opinion Editorial

   December 23, 2021

   Ontario, Canada reported 5,790 new COVID-19 cases on Thursday, December 23, 2021, setting the province'south one-solar day record for new cases since the first of the pandemic: Ontario: Case numbers | COVID-19. Th'southward numbers include 971 unvaccinated new cases compared to 4,392 fully vaccinated new cases—a quickly ascent trend over the by several weeks clearly showing that almost new cases are now occurring in fully vaccinated people.

Please help us to spread the word by sharing this commodity on social media.

worleysury1963.blogspot.com

Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-vaccines-must-be

Share this post